Monday, October 15, 2018

R.I.P., Patrick Baumann

Patrick Baumann, the long-time secretary-general of FIBA, the international basketball federation, died of a heart attack yesterday (October 14) while attending the Youth Olympics in Buenos Aires. He was 51.
"Nobody was more dedicated to the growth of basketball than Patrick,” said NBA commissioner Adam Silver. “He loved the game and recognized its power to transform people's lives." 
As secretary-general of FIBA, Baumann presided over the world governing body for basketball from the organization’s Geneva headquarters. Founded in 1932, the nonprofit FIBA comprised 212 national federations and is recognized by the International Olympic Committee, as the authority in the sport. Baumann, who had been a player, coach, and referee in Switzerland and Italy, joined FIBA in 1994 and was appointed secretary-general in 2002. 
I spoke with Baumann when he stopped in New York in July 2005. Here is that interview:

Q. What is FIBA’s mission?
Baumann: To promote the game of basketball worldwide and to create opportunities for everybody to play internationally.

Q. What’s new at FIBA?
Baumann: We have entered into a new era with the results on the court, which indicates to us that the game has truly grown globally. We have South Americans and Europeans at the same level as the USA, and that is really a new chapter in the history of basketball. FIBA is a 73-year-old baby, and it’s grown. The membership is more than 200 countries, and now we can say that we have 10 or 12 countries that are able to compete at the same level.

Q. That was certainly proved at the last Olympics, and in the disappointing show by the U.S. team.
Baumann: I don’t think it’s disappointing. From the perspective of FIBA, it’s the natural result of a 10- or 12-year coming together of the best players playing with the rest of the world. It’s the natural course of things, and I think that’s what makes sports exciting. 

Q. Tell me about “FIBA World Basketball,” a 26-minute weekly basketball magazine television show.
Baumann: We will start that in October. We would like to educate the world that basketball is played every week around the globe. And the best way to do this is through a weekly television show. We found a very good partner in Australia that is willing to take the investment because he believes in our sport and he believes in the opportunity for such a show, and I think this will be a perfect promotional vehicle for our sport. The key point for us is that an African country or an Asian country can see it and can start comparing where it stands with the rest of the world.

Q. You also have a new referee program to deal with different interpretations and styles of officiating throughout the world.
Baumann: It’s very difficult to have a standard uniformity to refereeing. The referee on the court is every much an individual as any player and has his way of looking at the game, of looking at how to apply the rules of the game. Our national federations are creating referees every year. For example, there are more than 9,000 referees in France. Out of them are about 20-25 international referees at the top level. We need to evaluate them, make sure that they find the right common language so when they go to international competitions, there is a uniform standard of refereeing.

Q. How do you assess the state and health of the game today?
Baumann: I think it’s one of the healthiest sports in the world. It has not reached the excesses of some other sports.

Q. What do you mean by excesses?
Baumann: I think that when there’s too much money, there are a lot of scandals, a lot of problems with refereeing that suddenly come along. Betting is behind the scenes. Clubs go bankrupt. We’ve seen this unfortunately. It is a European problem. I think that our sport is growing slowly but surely. 
We haven’t had too many doping problems. We do not have economic or financial scandals. We see the people keep investing, and grow their investment, in our sport, whether it’s in Asia, South America, Europe or here in the United States. We are really a healthy game and a healthy sport. We have also achieved in the Olympics with spectatorship and audience, which prove that our sport is well loved by the fans. 

Q. What is the biggest challenge in your position?
Baumann: To keep the world together. In the basketball world there are a lot of people that have different interests and a lot of organizations that do not have exactly the same interests. For sure you have those who have purely economic interests and use basketball as a tool for that. And then you have those who just do it on a voluntary basis, and that’s the majority of those that are practicing basketball around the world. 
We have to take care somehow that these very large groups of volunteers, of people who just love the game and are every day on the court and are forming young players, that they still get motivated in spite of the fact that maybe others are earning millions from the game and may like to go around and say it’s their game. That’s the difficult part. And we’re a political organization at the same time, so it’s a tricky thing to keep the world together.

Q. You have said, “Rather than speaking about achievements, we should speak about the challenges which are ahead of us,” one of which you identified as “finding the right balance between basketball as a business and the integrity of the sport.” Is that a delicate balance? 
Baumann: That balance depends on the people. I think that it’s very much something that depends on the human beings driving the game. And if they’re able to maintain their passion for the game and not overcommercialize it and look for the last cent out of everything, I think that balance can be achieved.

Q. You identified another challenge as “the development programs for high-level competition without neglecting the promotion of grass-roots basketball.” How do you address that challenge? One criticism of the game in the U.S. is that there has been a depreciation of fundamental skills. 
Baumann: It’s very tempting for a young coach in a small country. He’s got 12 kids and his goal is to win. So, the first thing he will try to do it set those kids on a court and simply play a zone. These poor little kids have a feeling that they know how to play basketball, but when they go to the next level, they realize that they are missing everything. In the key basketball schools, in Europe mainly or in countries like Serbia Montenegro and Lithuania, at 14 years old, either you have the skills or you’re gone. 
It’s extremely important for coaches to raise their quality standards so that they understand that the fundamentals are key and that the tactics, which they usually use when they are not so skilled as coaches, are for a later stage in the development of the players. Our role is to try to make a transfer of that knowhow that is in certain countries and move it around to other countries.

Q. The last Olympics revealed a fundamental excellence in skills and teamwork from a number of countries.
Baumann: I think it has changed. The U.S. player — I like to see him play. He still is, because of his athleticism, the quickest in execution of fundamentals. The difficulty is to put it together into a team. There is still a very good school of fundamentals in the U.S. Of course, it has probably declined a little bit. You see that now suddenly there are equal levels of skills or maybe there are more players in Europe that are more skillful than athletic. But 10 years ago, it was different. You can see it now with the three-point shooting.

Q. Marty Blake, director of scouting for the NBA, talked about “Basketball Without Borders,” in which the NBA goes into different countries and tries to help young people with basketball and non-basketball topics. FIBA is also involved with that program. 
Baumann: That’s a life experience. It’s a way of going into areas which will have difficulty in entering into the big world of basketball and giving the kids a feel for what the opportunity is in our sport. And at the same time having the opportunity for those kids in a more difficult situation to see that there is a level that they can reach and at the same time they can learn something from that experience. 
At the camps are drills and technical things, but at the same time it’s a life experience for them to be together with kids from other countries, to integrate different cultures, different mentalities and learn matters of life, whether it’s learning to read or learning matters on health and prevention. It’s a combination of a pure basketball camp with also an educational environment and integration.

Q. You have been with FIBA since 1994. How have the game and the business changed since then?
Baumann: The players have become more performers and so the game has become more interesting. With the play, level to level, a bit more equal, it makes the competition more interesting at the international level and therefore the interest has grown. Certainly the introduction of professionals in the Olympic movement helped very much. 
On the business side I would say we’ve grown in popularity and we’ve grown in generating revenues, from the club side in particular. It has become very much a business in Europe. And we see now that the investments of both broadcasters and sponsors is growing in our sport, maybe not at the same level as soccer is, but it’s definitely growing. 
The achievements of a league like the NBA helped us very much. There’s a will to emulate around the world the league mechanisms or systems like the NBA, and that helps grow our sport. It brings other investors into it. The economics of a league in Europe compared with the United States are still a little different. You do not yet have a purely business approach in Europe. 
So, you don’t find too many owners of teams in Europe who have the same kind of business approach as owners have here [in the U.S.]. Many times the owners in Europe feel that their personal investments and the promotion that they take from that investment turn up being on the first side of a newspaper all the time 

Q. You mentioned soccer. Are you making inroads, if that’s the right word, on soccer?
Baumann: It’s an interesting question. We compare ourselves to soccer in the sense of how are we managing our sports. Everybody does, whether it’s a league or a club or the international federation. But we compare ourselves to them in order to see whether the business courses that we are putting in place are similar to those that soccer puts in place and whether we are managing our sports in the same professional way. And I think this is the biggest change in the past 5-6 years: that we are getting more and more professional. Are we learning from the soccer experience how to become more professional? 
Now, from there, to generate the same kind of revenues, I think that there is a big difference in the rest of the world. In the U.S. I understand that soccer has a different position in the ranking of the sports. You have 80,000-spectator arenas for soccer while basketball we have 10,000. So the relationship between 1 to 8 is something we will never be able to match.

Q. You mentioned management of the sport and learning from soccer. Do you take some of the best practices from soccer and think that might work for FIBA?
Baumann: We do. We have a good relationship with FIFA, whether it’s on the commercial side or the political side. We learn from each other. We have gone probably further than them in branding our own federation, which is an exercise we did two years back. We have a new brand identity. We’ve given it a different look, and we’ve changed it into something unique in international sports families. There is a global mark [logo], and each one of the continental governing bodies has a [logo] across the family of branding.

Q. The New York Times reported that the number of international players on opening-day rosters in the NBA increased from 29 in 1997 to 81 this past season. A record seven international players competed in the NBA Finals. That points to the global growth of the sport.
Baumann: This is for us the best for the promotion of the game. At the same time, my European colleagues say, “Well, all those players are leaving from Europe to go to North America to play in the NBA. That’s bad. We’re losing the best talent.” But at the end it demonstrates a system of organized leagues and the possibility of creating a competition which generates consistent revenues. 
Most important is that the players performed well in the finals of the NBA. This was viewed all over the world and is excellent because the NBA is doing a great job in making sure that the rest of the world sees what’s happening in the United States and at the same time these same players go now in September to play for the European championship to qualify for the world championship. This is a perfect complement. If Tony Parker goes back and plays with a shirt “France,” it’s for the whole country, and that’s a big difference between any other country and the U.S.

Q. The national pride in the team.
Baumann: The national team is so important. The Spain/USA game last summer in Athens was not a very nice experience for Spain. But you had half of the population of Spain watching that game. That is a huge number.

Q. Nobody got much work done that day.
Baumann: (laughing) That national pride is wonderful. You enter a gym with a venue of 12,000 spectators to see Greece against Turkey. Or you go to see Uruguay vs. Argentina. It’s amazing. The emotions are so high. It’s just great. 

Q. Peter Holt of the San Antonio Spurs said the biggest crisis facing sports today is the image issue: “the image of [the] players, the image of the league itself, the image of professional sports.” Is image an international concern? 
Baumann: Yes, it is. As an international federation, we have to be a guardian for the integrity of our sport. We are the guardian to our players worldwide, to the international community, and we have to make sure that our sport is not involved in any scandals, does not have any doping issues, violence on the court, or any other troubles and that we do not have an exaggeration or overcommercialization of our sport. That is our daily role. We are extremely happy that there is no threat any more of a lockout in the U.S. A lockout in the U.S. may be seen purely as a domestic issue, but it has an impact on our sport and the rest of the world. 

Q. What’s been the best new idea in basketball? 
Baumann: Giving a new look to the ball.

Q. Jerry West said that what he would not miss in the game if they were eliminated were the dunk and the three-point shot.
Baumann: I would not disagree with him. The dunk is a nice part of the game, but for a purist and for those who have really grown up with the game, this is kind of the cherry on top of the pie. And the international [three-point] line is not as far away from the basket as in the NBA, so we see that it is actually getting too easy to shoot three-pointers. Teams tend to change their tactics. You drive to the basket and then pass the ball out. It’s almost against the spirit of the game. The spirit of the game is to drive to the basket and make a basket. It’s not to pas the ball out. It’s not a shooting contest. 

Q. Does the game need any rule changes?
Baumann: Not any major changes. The international rules are flexible enough to accommodate the philosophy of any coach. We are moving away from ball-control games with low scores and are now playing with more fast breaks and trying to be more athletic. And this is with the same set of rules. 
Of course, we’ve changed [the possession clock] from 30 seconds to 24 seconds, and that has increased the pace. In the women’s game we’ve moved to a smaller ball. We’ve made some adaptations in order to improve the game itself and the speed of the game. But at the end of the day, I think it’s in the hands of the coach and the players. They are the driving force on how our game is played. 
The beauty of the global game is that, for example, the Japanese team, small but extremely quick players who try to shoot from outside, for one game they can beat a [superior] team. 

Q. The different matchups and the strategic moves and countermoves hold a special fascination.
Baumann: Right. Of course, coaches have their big influence. Where we have to be very careful is when the coaches tend to control a little bit too much of the game and leave less freedom to the players. There must be the right balance. I think we have this. The Athens games were a perfect example of how one coach may outcoach his opponent and at the same time leave the freedom to his players.

Q. The U.S. finished sixth in the 2002 World Championship and third in the 2004 Olympics. USA Basketball has made Jerry Colangelo its first managing director of the senior national team. He will oversee the selection of the coaches and players and his first team will compete in the 2006 World Championships in Japan. What’s your opinion on the hiring and what his mission will be?
Baumann: I have a lot of respect for him and I think it’s a great step forward for USA Basketball. But it’s going to be very difficult. It’s an honor to be in charge of this and to represent the country, but it’s also a big challenge because that’s not going to be sufficient to hire Jerry Colangelo in that position. 
There will definitely need to be good scouting and advice coming from the rest of the world, wherever it can be taken, in order to really adapt to what will be the opponents’ plays and styles. It’s also going to be very difficult for him to convince players to really commit for three summers in a row. This is probably the biggest challenge that he will be facing.
This is not something specific to the United State; this is a challenge that everybody faces. In general, you see that today Argentine is Olympic champion. And if you look at the history of those players, you’ll see that have gone through a school since their junior times and you see that they have grown up in a national team at the various age levels. It’s going to be very hard for the United States to match that. 

Q. You referred earlier to the individual speed and athleticism of the U.S. players, but it’s the gap at the national team level that has been reduced if not eliminated, correct? 
Baumann: There is no more gap between the top national teams. I’m certain the U.S. will have the right coach for the national team, but it will be facing talented coaches and talented teams on the other side. But I think the key thing is that people have lost the respect, in a sense of fear, of playing against the United States, so people are now free to play their game. And that’s good for the game, from our perspective.

Q. You have been a player, coach, and official. I would imagine that all of that has been valuable to you in your decision-making nowadays.
Baumann: All of that, yes. It still helps to keep the contact with the grassroots level — and that’s something I miss because I don’t have the time anymore to be there — because that’s where basketball is being created, at the very lowest levels. But now I’m seeing [the game] from the other side. I can see the finals of the Olympic games, the finals of the NBA and the European championship. It’s interesting to see how all that movement at the grassroots level actually can lead to those big plays of those great players. 

Personal:
Date and Place of Birth: 8/5/67 in Zurich, Switzerland

Education: MBA, University of Chicago; master’s degree in sports administration management, University of Lyon; law degree, University of Lausanne

Q. How would you describe your management philosophy?
Baumann: Basketball is a team sport. It’s all about the team: the right people, the right environment, the skill people and particularly motivated people that really like what they do. 

Q. What’s the best call you have made in your position?
Baumann: To be able to rebrand FIBA.

Q. Greatest competitors?
Baumann: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Drazen Petrovic

Q. Smartest players?
Baumann: Maria Powell of Brazil and Tim Duncan

Q. What are you reading?
Baumann: Winning, by Jack Welch and The Empire of Shame, by Jean Ziegler 

Q. What’s a typical day off like?

Baumann: To play with my kids and try to help out my wife, who’s basically taking care 364 days for the rest of the house. 

Favorites:
Piece of music: The music of Vangelis
Author: Dante
Movie: The Godfather
Vacation spot: Barcelona
Quote: “To be or not to be.”


Thursday, October 4, 2018

R.I.P, Dave Anderson

Dave Anderson, a respected voice in New York and national sports journalism for over 50 years, died today at age 89. Starting as a 16-year-old copy boy in 1945 at the Brooklyn Eagle, he became a full-time writer in 1951 covering, among other things, the Brooklyn Dodgers. He later wrote for the New York Journal-American for 11 years before joining the staff of the New York Times in 1966 as a general assignment reporter. A columnist at the Times from 1971 until 2007, Anderson earned numerous awards in virtually every sport for his work, including the Pulitzer Prize in 1981 for distinguished commentary. Below is my interview with him for SportsBusiness Journal in 2005. Rest in peace to a classy writer and one of the great gentlemen in sports journalism.

Q. Let’s talk a little about journalism. The Miami Herald columnist Carl Hiassen gave a commencement address at the University of Miami's College of Communications. In talking about print journalism, he said, “Smart graduates know that this is a business whose future is pretty shaky.” He also said, about print journalism, that “There's no better way to learn about the world than sitting in a big city newsroom and having it laid out in front of you every single day.”
Anderson: I think he’s true on both counts. It’s shaky in the sense that more and more, people are reading less, reading newspapers less. That’s just the way the world is these days. People turn on their computer more than they open a newspaper.

Q. Ken Auletta, from The New Yorker, in a journalism leadership seminar last fall, said that humility is essential to journalism. He said that reporters are sometimes perceived as arrogant because they have a “compulsion to express an opinion,” rather than ask questions.
Anderson: That depends. A reporter, theoretically, is not supposed to express opinions. In journalism theory, a reporter reports. A columnist is allowed to express his opinion. That’s the difference.

Q. I think his point was that reporters are veering into the columnists’ territory.
Anderson: More and more, some reporters do that, depending on how much liberty they get from their editors in whatever newspapers they’re on. It’s not that simple at the [New York] Times, but it certainly is at many of the other papers around the country, especially the tabloids in New York.

Q. Former White House press secretary to George W. Bush Ari Fleischer said that there is a powerful tie between the pressure that government leaders and sports figures are under because of the way the media covers them.  Does the media coverage really create pressure?
Anderson: Well, sure, because there’s more media. Years ago, by years ago, I can go back 50 years when I started in the business in 1951 at the Brooklyn Eagle. Although in a sense I was in the business in 1945 as a copyboy at the New York Sun. But in those years, newspapers were everything. That’s all you had. That was media, except for magazines, but even in those years there weren’t that many magazines, and most of them were pictorial magazines. I’m thinking of Life and Look and some of the magazines like that. 
But today you have so much more media that newspapers are only a portion of it. And it’s a portion that most people don’t really care about anymore. Even with cable television—we didn’t have cable television really until roughly 1980, maybe the mid or late ‘70s. ESPN didn’t appear at all until 1979. But today you go to a ballgame, let’s say a midseason, Tuesday night ballgame between the Yankees and Kansas City, and where 30, 40, 50 years ago, you would have had roughly 10 writers at a game like that, today you have 50 to 60 to 70 writers, radio or television voices, and cameramen. That’s certainly true in New York. You have tremendous amount of media compared with what it used to be. 

Q. Frank Deford said that ever since sports went on TV, more and more people are familiar with it. 
Anderson: That’s true. I think television has created readers. People who watch the games will be much more inclined to read about it the next day.

Q. He also said that sportswriters are more and more handmaidens of television. “We’re really not allowed to write a whole lot about things that don’t appear on television,” he said.
Anderson: That’s not true. I don’t think so. That could be true in covering an event, but that doesn’t mean you don’t write about things that develop off or beyond television.

Q. There doesn’t seem to be anything that is not covered on television now: poker, bass fishing, billiards, and so on.
Anderson: Right. What is there that’s worth covering that isn’t on TV?

Q. You started out in 1951 at the Brooklyn Eagle
Anderson: I was a copy boy at the New York Sun in 1945. I was 16 years old. That was strictly a summer job. My senior year at Xavier High School in Manhattan, I worked in the sports department on Saturdays for $5. I was the richest kid on the street corner. In my junior year at Holy Cross, the Sun folded. I think it was January of 1950. I had been more or less promised a job at the Sun when I got out of college, but by the time I graduated, there was no Sun. I wound up getting a job as a clerk in the sports department of the Brooklyn Eagle in August of 1951 for $40 a week.

Q. You were an English Lit major, a literate guy coming into sports journalism. 
Anderson: Well, I passed the test. Let’s put it that way. I don’t know how literate I was.

Q. How do you assess the state of sportswriting today?
Anderson: I think it’s better than ever overall, by far. There are better writers, especially better young writers. There’s a tremendous amount of young, very capable, excellent sports writers today. And I think a lot of that is because of television. They grow up watching television, watching the games on television and then wanting to read about it, and then wanting to write about it. To me, writing goes back to reading. If you don’t like to read, what would make you want to become a writer? And if you want to be a writer, there’s no better training than reading.

Q. What’s the biggest change you have seen in sports business journalism since you started?
Anderson: One thing is that the editors —the executive editors and the managing editors—of the newspapers are giving more attention and more space and more importance to sports. Just look at the Times. For years the Times had a sports section almost hidden in a cave somewhere in the paper. I always joked that you had to call AAA every morning to find out where the sports section was. Now we have our own section; now we have color. The progress of printing and everything else and also the importance of the public’s devotion to sports has made editors realize that sports can sell their papers. The people do want to read about it.

Q. Television timeouts interrupt the flow of the games…
Anderson: The TV time-outs kill me in pro football games. I keep saying, “Play the game.”

Q. Does the business of sport threaten to overwhelm the sport itself?
Anderson: It certainly rivals it because there’s so much money in sports today: the television money, the sponsorship money, the salaries of the athletes. Everything is bigger and bigger in the form of dollars and cents every year. It just keeps going up. That’s the way it is. It wasn’t that way a long time ago, but in those years not that many people went to the ball games. Now people say will television keep people away from the ballgames? But it’s proven for the Yankees at least that television has drawn people to the ballgames.  

Q. Who is the shrewdest or most creative businessman in sports you’ve ever seen? 
Anderson: Over the last 30-40 years, I would say Mark McCormack, the golf impresario, who died recently. He did more to build one sport, golf, than any other. He branched out, but golf was his basic sport. He built it into the huge sport that it is today. 
Walter O’Malley, as much as everybody in Brooklyn still despises him for moving the Dodgers, was an incredibly prescient sports businessman in going to Los Angeles. And that was in the 1950s. What people do today is really a spinoff of what O’Malley and McCormack did a long time ago.

Q. You have interviewed and written about some of the great performers in sports. Who is the most memorable?
Anderson: Muhammad Ali. We’ve never had anybody like Muhammad Ali and we’ll never have anybody like him ever again. The interesting word there is “interview” because most of the time, you didn’t have to interview Muhammad, nor would he let you interview him. Usually you would find him wherever he was, maybe at a press conference after he had sparred a few rounds. Somebody would ask him a mundane question and he would go into a monologue for the next 20 minutes. You very rarely had a sit-down question-and-answer session with him. But you didn’t need it. He made news just by whatever he happened to be talking about that day. He knew what you wanted to hear, and he could do it. It was like turning on a faucet.

Q. What’s the best thing about sports?
Anderson: You have a winner and a loser virtually every day. I say that as a writer. When people ask me, “Would you have rather gone into writing a general column or writing about politics?” In politics, you seldom know who the winner is and who the loser is for 10 or 15 — maybe 100 — years. In sports, you know every day who won. 

Q. Is showtime an inextricable part of sports? 
Anderson: Sure. The reason is the television camera. That’s why they do these things, because they know the camera is on them.

Q. Rick Reilly of Sports Illustrated said one reason he enjoys covering golf is because there are no guaranteed contracts. 
Anderson: Exactly. I’ve written that for 30 years

Q. In a letter to Bud Selig criticizing the advertising patches on the players’ uniforms during the Yankees/Devil Rays series in Japan, Ralph Nader said that “overcommercialization is sapping the fun out of being a fan of Major League Baseball.” Where would sports be without advertising?
Anderson: It’s one thing to have an advertisement on the outfield wall; it’s another to have it on the player’s sleeve, especially in a team situation like that. The NFL doesn’t do that; the NBA doesn’t do that. None of the team-oriented leagues do that. The racing drivers started it, I’m sure. Tennis players and golfers do it. There’s also a limit. You can’t have 10 logos on you. I don’t know if technically there’s a limit in their contracts with the PGA Tour, but nobody seems to have 10 logos on them.

Q. Pat Williams of the Orlando Magic said that after 9/11 he was so proud to be working in sports because he said it’s the heartbeat of the country, what gives America its juice. 
Anderson: I think that is true to a great extent, because there’s so much media interest in sports, because there’s so much sports on television, the television rules out lives, whether we like it or not, and people grow up watching sports. Not everybody —thank heaven, please, not everybody — but so many people do. The Red Sox reminded us of how deeply embedded that team was in the psyches of everybody in New England and any Red Sox fan who lived outside New England. This has been almost a 100-year war for those people to finally win a World Series. And that’s true all over the country in various depths.

Q. What do you think of the new MLB steroid policy? 
Anderson: It’s better than the previous one, certainly. The previous one had no teeth at all to it. Players could circumvent it without any fear of being caught. This one at least has a little more juice to it — pardon the take-off on the word juice. I’d still like to see it boiled down … I don’t know if you want the Olympic situation where you can get a lifetime ban very quickly, but I’d like to see them make the punishment more severe. 
Too many of the players don’t seem to care that steroids may be harming their health if not eventually killing them at an early age. But if they know that they can’t play baseball if they get caught, that their career would be over, certainly that would be more of a deterrent.

Q. Will there be a west side stadium in New York? Do we need a west side stadium?
Anderson: I hope not. New York has many more things to do with its money than help the Jets build a west side stadium. New York doesn’t need the Olympics either. New York has too many monetary problems to worry about a stadium for the Olympics.


Personal:
Date and Place of Birth: May 6, 1929 in Troy, N.Y.
Education: College of the Holy Cross, 1951

Favorites:
Vacation spot: The Hamptons, to relax and play golf.
Music: Sinatra 
Author and book: Hemingway, The Old Man and the Sea
Sporting event: 1980 U.S. Olympic Hockey Gold Medal team
Movie: “The Bridge on the River Kwai”
Actress: Hmm. I have several. All men have several, right? Just say all of them.
Quote: The quote I remember, and I used it when Red Smith died. Red had used it at another eulogy: “Dying is no big deal; the least of us will manage that. Living is the trick."

Smartest player: Jack Nicklaus
Greatest competitor: Joe Frazier
Toughest player: Lawrence Taylor
Best coach: Vince Lombardi. I was lucky enough to get to know him when he was an assistant year ago with the New York Giants, so I as around him a lot.

Something about you that nobody knows:
I was the year behind [Bob] Cousy and the first guy to spell it C-O-O-Z—in the school paper. The Boston papers were spelling it C-O-U-S. I spelled it C-O-O-Z. That’s the way everybody’s spelled it since.