Sunday, June 19, 2011

Pop




Blessed at and grateful for both ends of fatherhood
Oscar Wilde wrote, "Who being loved is poor?" By that definition, my father, Joseph Kavanagh, was a wealthy man. He would have found that ironic. He never owned his own house, never owned a luxury car, and never traveled too far for too long from home.

Pop never considered himself wealthy in any material sense, never even aspired to affluence or dreamed of striking it rich. It wasn’t important. He was an unpretentious man of simple tastes and desires. He didn’t need much and asked for even less. What he had was enough for him, but he worked very hard for everything he gave his wife and children. What he had he unselfishly and unhesitatingly shared. And what he left us can’t be measured or counted.

Pop was no ordinary Joe. He was rich in virtue. He was honorable and generous and utterly lacking in malice. He was never envious of anyone else’s better fortune, never resentful of another’s higher station in life. I never heard him speak ill of anyone. Never. Think about that for a minute. I never heard him utter a profane word. He was a gentleman: an honest-to-goodness good and honest man.

He made friends easily because he was so easy to like. He was outgoing and warm and funny. He always had a story or a joke. Even as his cancer advanced as he grew weaker, he maintained his sense of humor. Drinking his daily Glucerna for diabetes, he told my son, Peter, “It’s in a Schlitz glass but it’s not Schlitz.” Shortly before that, he had had to give up what he called his “Robitussin.” That was his code name for scotch.

Toward the end, the medication that was prescribed to ease the pain he never complained about caused him to hallucinate. I overheard conversations he was reliving with family and friends from long ago and not so long ago. In every situation in that surreal state, which was out of his power to control, he was in a good mood, smiling and happy where he thought he was and whom he was with. That was Pop.
 
Growing up, I remember a lot of the colorful things he used to say:
“What’s for dessert?” we’d ask.
“Dessert the table,” he’d say.
Or, “Pop, do you want a cup of coffee?”
“No, thanks. I just had my shoes shined.”
I never knew what that meant, but it always made me laugh.
That was Pop, too.
When his birthday would roll around and we’d ask him what we could give him, he’d always say, “A kind word.”

Every year he announced that he was giving up orange layer cake for Lent. That, of course, couldn’t compare with the genuine sacrifices he routinely made for us.

He wasn’t perfect, as he would have been the first to admit. He was too normal and down to earth. But even the imperfections had their own charm. Not the most patient man, Pop always seemed to be in a hurry, as if he were double-parked. Hurry up and wait, we used to say. If you were at the wheel of the car in front of him at a red light and didn’t have the reflexes of a racecar driver when that light turned, you’d get the horn. “That light’s not gonna get any greener, Buddy,” Pop would say.

He wasn’t much for chitchat or small talk, either. Whenever the families would get together for a birthday or christening or some holiday or special occasion, Pop wouldn’t be sitting with the adults. He’d be playing hopscotch with his granddaughters or having a catch with one of the kids — and showing them how to throw a knuckleball —shooting baskets, or volunteering to pitch a wiffle-ball game. And he couldn’t be bothered to remember the names of our friends or the kids’ friends. He got around that by calling everyone “Herbie” or “Gwendolyn.” He carried that off for two generations.

I don’t ever remember Pop complaining about anything. He was never bitter, not even when all the cruel infirmities and indignities visited him with ever-increasing frequency later in life. It could not have been easy for him. Little by little, he began to lose his independence. His worsening eyesight, brought on by a stroke and glaucoma, forced him to give up his car. Rather than lament the loss, he adapted. He always made the best of a situation. That was Pop. This was a man who, as far as I remember, never missed a day of work.

Later on, he wouldn’t hear of using a cane. That was for the “old folks,” he’d say. But my sister Kathie got around that when she came up with the brilliant idea of getting him his Irish walking stick. That gave him even more character. He loved retelling the story on himself of the time when his youngest grandson, in a hurry to get out the back door but stuck behind Pop, cried, “Move it, slowpoke!”

Pop loved sports, especially the Yankees. The night of my wedding rehearsal, when we had everyone at our house, Pop would sneak out to the kitchen to listen to the radio for a few minutes and then give us all an update on the game. Even with his poor vision, he watched every Yankees game on network television in his final summer. He’d confound us with what he could and could not see, but apparently he could detect when Derek Jeter waved futilely at a pitch in the dirt. “What’s he swinging at!” Pop would say.

Pop himself was a tremendous athlete. Not that he ever mentioned it. That was another thing about him: He never bragged, never talked about himself. He was old school that way. If he caught anyone starting to boast even slightly, he’d say, “Don’t break your arm patting yourself on the back.” He had an athletic scholarship to St. John’s that he never received after a new athletic director that summer, with his own agenda, reneged on the promise of the previous A.D. Without the scholarship, Pop couldn’t afford to go to college. He wasn’t bitter, but he did take great delight forever after whenever any St. John’s team lost. When I dribbled out the remaining seconds of a 17-point beating the St. Francis freshman basketball team gave St. John’s in 1971, he sat happily in the stands in Alumni Hall.

Pop was New York City Catholic schools’ single’s champ in tennis in 1937 out of St. Francis Prep. He never mentioned that to me. I discovered it when as a kid I saw his varsity letter in his drawer and asked my mother about it. He as well as the public and private school champs then met in a three-man tournament to decide the city’s overall champion. Pop defeated the public school winner. Immediately afterwards, he was told he had to play a kid from Poly Prep, who, thanks to a bye, had sat and watched the first match. Pop lost. I asked him about that one night toward the end when just the two of us were together. Did he think he would have won if he had had the bye, or if all things had been equal? Sixty-seven years later, he said he didn’t know. Modest and honest. That also was Pop. 

The first time I played tennis with him, I must have been a teenager. I hadn’t played much but thought, How hard could it be to compete against someone more than 30 years older? I better take it easy on him, I told myself. Don’t want him to get hurt at his age. Little did I know. He ran me into the ground while he never broke a sweat. 

At the Surf Club in Breezy Point, which for years was his summer vacation, Pop, at age 47, was the starting shortstop and leadoff batter on the club’s all-star team, a team mostly of players in their late teens and early 20s! This was incomprehensible to me, 14 years old at the time. That activity lasted until he tore a knee ligament hustling out of the batter’s box. He then turned to the more sedate game of bocce, where he competed in the Surf Club’s annual tournament.


The original Pop with his Dolly
After his forced retirement from sports, he dutifully attended his grandchildren’s Little League, soccer, and basketball games and then graduated to the school sports. Pop had come to all of my youth games. He was supportive without being an obvious presence. That was in the day when parents didn’t micromanage their children’s careers. He never interfered. Sports was fun, not a job. You figured things out on your own and you learned from your mistakes. That was the way it was.

With his grandchildren he became a more vocal fan. Any of us who sat next to him in the stands at Pearl River’s Anderson Field held our breath when he offered unsolicited advice on what some Little Leaguer needed to do to improve. Often, the youngster’s mother was sitting within earshot. He attended so many of his grandchildren’s games, but he drew the line at some extracurricular functions.

“Pop, are you coming to my dance recital?” Lauren or Paula would ask him.
In his sweetest voice, Pop would say, “I have to work that day, honey. When is it?”

Pop was always working. Even after he officially retired and moved from Brooklyn, he worked. He was always available to baby-sit. He put a lot of miles on his car over the years, chauffeuring his own kids to various places and functions when we were younger, and later on continued to do the same for his grandchildren. Pop always said he worked more after he retired than he did before he retired. He had two jobs in Pearl River: as school crossing guard and as cashier/ambassador in his friend’s photo shop. There he was able to meet and make even more friends.

Pop was a real man, and a man of great faith and great love for his wife and children. I have memories of him telling my mother how good dinner was, of making a demonstrable show of his affection, of appreciating all she did for him. You remember those things. He had a policy of never going to bed mad. Consequently, he never carried a grudge. 

I remember a lot of the good that Pop did, much of which he performed quietly and without fanfare. He took in his sickly brother-in-law and helped support him for years, generously making room for him and sharing his own time and limited space. Looking back, I can see now where that could not have been easy. I couldn’t see that at the time because he never complained, never called attention to it. That was Pop. He did the right thing simply because it was the right thing to do. What a role model! And he never would hear of any praise about himself.

Pop made us all richer by his presence, and we have been left poorer by his absence all these years. A day does not pass that I do not think of him. After he was gone, I never prayed for him. I figured, if he needed help getting into heaven there was no hope for the rest of us.

I wish I were more like him. He was so outgoing and personable and never took himself too seriously. What I remember most about Pop, and what I’ll always cherish, was his cheerfulness. When he'd drop by on a weekend afternoon, I’d ask him if he wanted a beer. He would never simply say yes or no. “Is the sun over the yardarm yet?” he’d ask. “I’ll have a pint, Guv’nor,” he’d say in this corny Cockney accent. Then he’d raise his glass and announce theatrically, “First of the day!”

Later today, on this Fathers Day, my favorite and proudest day of the year, I will raise my glass and toast the memory of a good man, my father — the richest man I ever knew.

Monday, May 30, 2011

Blithe Spirit

Arriving at school on a bright Friday morning, I was still wearing my bifocal shades when I entered the building. On the way to my classroom, I was excitedly approached by Owen, an effervescent student and altogether winning fifth-grader serving as one of that day’s hallway safety monitors. He didn’t know whether to give me a fist bump or a high five, so he gave me one of each.
“Are those 3-D glasses?” he asked breathlessly.
No, they’re X-ray lenses, I teased him. They allow me see through walls.
“Can I try them, please?”
I handed over the frames.
“Oh, yeah. Cool! Everything is a lot closer,” said Owen. He handed them back. “Thank you.”  

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Innocence II

TOP 10 THINGS HEARD IN THE FIRST AND SECOND GRADES THIS WEEK:
“This is a good book!”
“You look like my grandpa with your glasses off.”
“We’re stuck with you all day, right?”
“Boys have muscles; that’s what we can’t hit girls.”
“Some women are stronger than men.”
“So, how do you like being my teacher?”
“By accident, Anthony got sand in my eyes. The nurse said that the more I blinked, the better my eyes could get.”
“I’m finding some good facts in this [shark] book.”
“My dad said that if I didn’t get all 10 spelling words right, I couldn’t have ice cream tonight—and I really wanted ice cream tonight.”
“Women, especially British, wear hats.” [on one difference between the sexes]

Friday, May 20, 2011

Vocations

     “Mr. K, does this sentence make sense to you?” asked one of the sixth-graders during literacy class.
     She had written “I had a rendezvous with one of my patients.”
     The speaker is a doctor?
     “Yes.”
     She was using “rendezvous” as a synonym for “appointment.”
     Are you going to be a doctor someday?
     “Either a doctor or a racecar driver—my dad likes racecars—or a veterinarian,” she said.
      I told her that she had the jump on her classmates in narrowing down her fields of study at such an early age.
     After retreating to her desk she made a quick U-turn.
     “I don’t have any idea what this word means,” she said.
     The word was “deprived.”
     The first thing that popped into my head was the line from “West Side Story” about the gang members being depraved because they are deprived. She was reading “The Diary of Anne Frank,” and the vocabulary exercise called for the students to pause over an unfamiliar word and first try to understand the meaning from context before consulting a dictionary and then writing an original sentence to demonstrate comprehension of the word.
     The passage in the book described the author’s parents, peremptorily seized by the Nazis, being permitted to carry away a rucksack and some money only to be “deprived” of those items shortly thereafter.
     Can you figure out the meaning from the context? I asked. Suppose, I told her, I were a mean substitute. (I immodestly used the subjunctive to denote a statement contrary to fact.) I would first deny you your books, laptop, calculator, and any instruments that might help you as a student, and then deprive you of even pencil and paper in class.
     “Oh, I get it,” she said. “Thank you.”
     But I was the one who was grateful.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Slow Men Working

The Yankees, on April 21, expressed consternation over the number of appearances put in by their bullpen. And the New York beat reporters assigned to cover the Yankees dutifully echoed the team’s message. The Journal News and the Daily News on April 22 reported on manager Joe Girardi’s concern that his relievers, three weeks into the season, were already carrying far too large a share of the workload.  Never mind that the Yankees had two days off that week.

Joba Chamberlain, it was reported, had appeared in 10 of the team’s first 16 games, throwing 162 pitches. We are to infer that that constitutes a heavy burden for the 25 year old. Let’s see, the season started on March 31, so that worked out to a little more than seven pitches a day, 10 pitches per game, and 54 pitches per week for Chamberlain. This week, Chamberlain was given the night off on Wednesday because he had appeared in three of the team's four previous games. Never mind that he had thrown just nine pitches in Tuesday night's game and that Monday was an off day.

But not only Chamberlain, we read. The starting pitchers’ “inability to work deep into games has shifted an unsustainable burden to the team’s high-powered bullpen.” Really?  Are the players’ agents now covering the beat and writing the copy, too? An “unsustainable burden?”

Here are a few suggestions:
For the beat reporters, try thinking critically. It won’t hurt. Just because the Yankees put out a press release is no reason to swallow it without chewing.

For the Yankees’ pitchers, during the offseason, hire a trainer and/or nutritionist, join a gym, buy a pair of running shoes, and show up at the start of spring training in shape. Work the obliques.

For anyone who has not witnessed baseball players running, think of a jaywalker blithely crossing the street who upon seeing an approaching vehicle suddenly takes a few accelerated steps. That approximates the pace of their running.   

For Girardi, take a page out of the Nolan Ryan playbook. That is, (1) leave your starters in longer and let them figure out how to pitch out of tight spots, (2) don’t use every reliever in your bullpen in every game, and (3) try using a reliever for more than one inning. It used to be done all the time.